HomeNewsBenefits & Pensions About UsContact Us

 Magazine Archives
 News Archives
 Calendar
 Money Managers
 Group Insurers
 Consultants
 Custodians
 Associations
 Careers
 Links
 Canadian Investment Review
 Canadian Healthcare Manager

Current issue is available online







The most current pension and investment information available in Canada, located in these easy to use directories. Click on any logo for information.

© Copyright 2000 Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the June 2000 edition of BENEFITS CANADA magazine.

New world order

This extended period of low inflation is making pension asset management more challenging than ever. And that's not the half of it.

By Dian Cohen

Pension plan sponsors and managers have their work cut out for them as never before. They've always had to manage their plans in a way that ensures members receive their promised income upon retirement. But for the foreseeable future, the risks to plan solvency are coming hard and fast. Let us count the ways.

A non-inflationary environment brings a great many issues with it. Obviously, low, long-term interest rates make life more difficult because managers have to be more skilful in achieving the required returns. But an equally important issue is the controversy over whether a low inflation/deflation scenario is an aberration or normality.

Most money managers have cut their teeth on inflation. But there is still far too little appreciation that rising productivity is embedded in the shift to a networked global economy, and that will keep costs low. The failure to appreciate the new environment makes it more difficult for managers to be as decisive in their day-to-day decisions as they were when they understood what was happening to their world.

It's probably more clear today than it was a couple of years ago, but managers now have to find other assets to take the place of long-term government bonds. With the shifting tides of voters moving away from big borrowing needs (prodded by capital markets that put the kibosh on them a few years ago), indebted governments have got their acts together and have retired a lot of long-term debt.

The U.S. is buying bonds back like they're going out of style. These risk-free instruments were the bread and butter of pension managers, but from now on they will be in short supply. What will take their place? Instruments that carry more risk. There are lots of such vehicles in the capital markets, but they take a great deal more investigation.

Volatile stock markets present challenges as well. Again, uncertainty is a constant companion. Until a couple of months ago, conversation and analysis revolved around old economy and new economy stocks. Then came the March/April pull-back of the Nasdaq and other tech-based exchanges and people changed the definition of the old economy to the real economy.

The implication that the new economy isn't real is nothing more than the bravado of people who are afraid of the unknown, and uncomfortable with the notion that everything they grew up with and thought they understood is now changing.

The new economy is neither new nor unreal. The instruments that have made it possible have been the wired technology of telecommunications, including TV and jumbo jets. Phones and planes are 100 years old, TV is pushing 70. Figuring out how to get the returns while minimizing risk is made far more difficult for people who look to stability and predictability, as in "such and such a company has been in business for 100 years . . ."

In the new world, new is more powerful than any signifiers of long experience. Yet it's taken us all these years to assimilate telegraph, phone and computers into a national network. Failure to understand the implications of networked computers (the foundation of e-commerce) adds risk to the decision-making ability of all the stakeholders involved in managing pension plans.

Just as a new attitude about government debt has created more risk for pension managers, so too have changing social attitudes. Take, for example, the Ontario government's decision to allow pensioners with a terminal illness to demand a lump-sum payout from their pension plan. Actuarial calculations of a sound pension plan, which determine contribution rates, never anticipated this move. Conceivably, such lump-sum demands could impact the solvency of a plan. The Ontario government is studying the implications of its ruling, but the point is that any regulation can raise risk, and that too has to be managed.

It's small wonder that plan sponsors and money managers are moving responsibility for after-work income to the recipients of the income. For my money, education is the key to minimizing risk--exposing people to the techniques of wealth creation and to the possibilities just now being dreamed of that the networked world offers.

Dian Cohen is an economics consultant with a special interest in pension issues.


 























Click here to enter:
6th Annual Communication Awards

Sponsored by:

 

 

The Group Internet Directory is now online. Click below to download the PDF.
English | French

The Romanow Commission has released its final report on the future of healthcare in Canada.

For Commissioner Romanow's recommendations, click here.

Click here for Senator Michael Kirby's report, "The Health of Canadians – The Federal Role: Recommendations for Reform."

About Us News Magazine Archives Benefits & Pensions
Links Careers Calender Contact UsHome