HomeNewsBenefits & Pensions About UsContact Us

 Magazine Archives
 News Archives
 Calendar
 Money Managers
 Group Insurers
 Consultants
 Custodians
 Associations
 Careers
 Links
 Canadian Investment Review
 Canadian Healthcare Manager

Current issue is available online







The most current pension and investment information available in Canada, located in these easy to use directories. Click on any logo for information.

© Copyright 2000 Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the March 2001 edition of BENEFITS CANADA magazine.


New rules of diversification

Market volatility has rendered the rule of 20 stocks obsolete. Your portfolio may be twice as risky as it once was.

By Barbara Clapham

Having heard the saying 'don't put all your eggs in one basket' since childhood, most people grasp the concept of spreading their money among different assets to reduce risk. Not long ago the general rule-of-thumb was that investing in 20 different securities would reduce the total risk of a portfolio while enhancing potential return. Diversifying beyond this number would not produce any further benefit.

"Thirty or 40 years ago in the U.S. market, a single randomly selected stock had a standard deviation 35 percentage points higher than a portfolio invested in an equally weighted index of all available stocks. A portfolio of 20 individual stocks could reduce this excess risk to a modest level of about five percentage points," explains John Campbell, professor of applied economics at Harvard University and managing partner, research, at Arrowstreet Capital in Boston, Mass.

But now, this conventional wisdom has been challenged. "During the last decade, a single randomly selected stock has had a standard deviation 50 percentage points higher than an equally weighted index, and it takes a portfolio of 50 stocks to reduce excess risk to 5%," says Campbell. In other words, a portfolio consisting of 20 securities now has excess risk of 10%--twice as much as before.

So what's changed in the past 10 years? Although the volatility of the overall market has not increased, the volatility of individual stocks has been on an upward trend for some time now, says Campbell. A typical stock is not only more volatile than before, but less correlated with other stocks. Campbell cites two factors that have contributed to this change: the trend away from large conglomerates towards companies focused on one or two key areas, and the tendency to list companies earlier in their life cycle when their futures are less certain.

There have also been changes in the global environment that international investors should pay particular attention to. Waves of country volatility associated with international crises have caused country volatility to increase from 9% per year in the mid-1990s to roughly 12% in the last few years.

Within countries, sector volatility has followed suit. A few years ago, it was half of country volatility, but today it's about the same, observes Campbell. It's not altogether clear why this has occurred but the run-up in tech stocks, the subsequent collapse shifts in oil prices and changes in interest rates are likely culprits.

Harry Gibbs, vice-president, investments, with the Workplace Safety & Insurance Board in Toronto, encourages investors to look at what is going on within individual sectors. "I find it hard to swallow that you just accept all stocks, good and bad, and buy the sector. It's good to have the talent to mine the sector." Gibbs points out that this can be achieved through passive screening.

As for increased volatility, Gibbs thinks the huge volume and flow of information on the markets today is a driving force behind this trend.

"We are still learning what is good news and what is bad data. Reacting to all of it creates a huge amount of volatility." Because of this and other distinctive factors at play, Gibbs says it's helpful to keep in mind that increased sector volatility may be a transient trend.

Trends aside, the changes in the markets in effect today have made attention to proper diversification among companies, sectors and countries more important than ever. The good news is, this costs nothing. As Campbell says, "diversification is a lunch that has not only remained free, but has grown more lavish over the years." Just make sure you have some of every course.

Barbara Clapham is editor of Canadian Investment Review and a contributing editor to BENEFITS CANADA.

*** ***


CONFERENCES

Pension Investment and Governance 2001
March 21 to 23, 2001
Hilton Hotel, 145 Richmond St. W., Toronto

Industry leaders will address governance challenges and solutions. Call (800) 815-0604 or e-mail order@insightinfo.com.

























Click here to enter:
6th Annual Communication Awards

Sponsored by:

 

 

The Group Internet Directory is now online. Click below to download the PDF.
English | French

The Romanow Commission has released its final report on the future of healthcare in Canada.

For Commissioner Romanow's recommendations, click here.

Click here for Senator Michael Kirby's report, "The Health of Canadians – The Federal Role: Recommendations for Reform."

About Us News Magazine Archives Benefits & Pensions
Links Careers Calender Contact UsHome