|
© Copyright 2002
Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the March 2002 edition of
BENEFITS CANADA magazine.
Investment Strategies
Crackdown on
accounting
The Canadian Securities Administrators has issued
new reporting guidelines that call for greater transparency. Is anyone
listening?
By Caroline Cakebread
Accountants are on the hot seat. with the collapse of a
giant like Enron Corp., it's obvious that just about every securities watchdog
in the U.S. let a whale of a problem slip through their nets.
Fear that the balance sheets of other corporate entities
might be subject to the same slippery accounting practices that brought Enron
down has led to widespread mistrust among investors.
This has driven down equity markets worldwide. Now, in
the aftermath, investors want to know who is responsible for checking the
books.
CSA NOTICE In an effort to address
concerns about accounting practices, the Canadian Securities Administrators
(CSA) has issued a notice to all staff about the widespread use of
unconventional measures in company earnings reports. The timely notice outlines
the CSA's expectations regarding the publication of earnings measures other than
those outlined by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The notice
warns that, in recent years, it has become common for some Canadian firms to
stray from GAAP in reports issued to investors and the media.
Opaque terms such as "pro-forma earnings," "operating earnings," "cash
earnings," "EBITDA" (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization) and "adjusted earnings" are sometimes used to cover up the
less-than-satisfactory performance of corporate clients. And they confuse many
retail investors. As the CSA points out, these non-GAAP earnings measures lack a
standard, agreed-upon meaning. More to the point, they don't present a complete
picture of how well or poorly a company is doing.
Cameron McInnis, senior accountant with the Ontario Securities Commission in
Toronto, says there is no specific securities rule that deals with the use of
additional information such as non-GAAP earnings measures in company reporting.
However, there are rules that state companies must not use misleading
information. If they do, they are clearly in violation of the Canadian
Securities Act. "It is hoped that companies are going to take the guidance in
the notice and use it to act responsibly to their shareholders," says McInnis.
The CSA notice outlines six main guidelines for issuers using non-GAAP
earnings measures in their reports. In the recommendations, issuers are
encouraged to discuss why they are using non-GAAP earnings measures if they do
so. As McInnis explains: "if a company has undergone a restructuring and they
had restructuring charges and wanted to show their results without the effect of
these charges, they would call that 'adjusted earnings.' We want the company to
tell us why they are adjusted--what's the reason and why are they using this?"
Canada's securities regulators would also like to see a "clear
reconciliation" between non-GAAP and GAAP earnings measures in all reports. This
means that when issuers use non-GAAP earnings measures they should be presented
prominently with the earnings measures for the period in accordance with GAAP.
SETTING AN EXAMPLE One example of a
company that has taken steps to provide greater transparency in its reports is
Nortel Networks. Following criticism that its third-quarter earnings report was
confusing, Nortel made its fourth-quarter report more transparent. Improvements
include a clearer reconciliation between non-GAAP and GAAP measures and more
cautious language.
Nortel is a positive example of change. But how likely is it that other
companies will follow suit--especially if they have not been subject to the
level of public scrutiny that Nortel has faced?
As the Enron case has proven, accounting standards are central to the
integrity of any capital-market system. The CSA's guidelines are commendable,
but without specific legislation the question still remains--do Canada's
securities watchdogs have the teeth needed to prevent disasters like Enron from
happening here? BC
Caroline Cakebread
is the editor of Canadian Investment Review, BENEFITS CANADA's sister
publication.
ccakebread@rmpublishing.com.
|