HomeNewsBenefits & Pensions About UsContact Us

 Magazine Archives
 News Archives
 Calendar
 Money Managers
 Group Insurers
 Consultants
 Custodians
 Associations
 Careers
 Links
 Canadian Investment Review
 Canadian Healthcare Manager

Current issue is available online







The most current pension and investment information available in Canada, located in these easy to use directories. Click on any logo for information.

© Copyright 2002 Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the April 2002 edition of BENEFITS CANADA magazine.

A DB REVIVAL
The guarantees of defined benefit plans are more appealing to employees in this age of uncertainty. Here are some ways plan sponsors can overcome the obstacles inherent in these plans.
By David Burke and Anne Cowling

The growth of defined contribution (DC) plans in Canada over the past 10 years has been fuelled by both employee and employer needs. Workers demanded more portability and control over their investments, and plan sponsors sought a viable and cost-effective alternative to defined benefit (DB) plans.

A survey of 603 Canadian organizations conducted by Watson Wyatt Canada last year reveals that 42% of employers have DC plans while only 28% have DB plans. In addition, 13% of organizations provide a combination of both plans. The prevalence of DC plans is not surprising, particularly considering these plans gained significant ground during the recent stretch of economic growth.

But times change. And so may have employees' preference for DC plans. In the midst of economic uncertainty, the security of DB plans is attractive again--especially to individuals nearing retirement.

While the value of DC plans fluctuates with the markets, the value of DB pension funds remains stable given the long-term horizon of investment and funding for these plans (see "Inconsistent retirement income," page 35). This is because Canadian pension funds typically invest about 40% of their assets in bonds and other fixed income investments that tend to do well when stocks are weak and interest rates are low.

Those unlucky DB plans facing review in the next few months may experience fund losses. Plan sponsors should keep in mind that accounting rules allow gains, losses and funding increases to be spread out over several years. So any losses incurred this year need not have a significant impact on an organization's financial statement.

There are other ways to tackle the costs associated with fund losses on financial statements. They include the use of the 10% asset/liability corridor--which can be used before aggregate gains and losses have to be amortized--as well as smoothing methods (an averaging or weighting mechanism that takes fluctuations into account over a number of years) that reduce the volatility of asset values. Only 20% of organizations surveyed last year report having used a smoothed market value of assets to determine their pension expenses.

Through a combination of prudent investment policies and professional use of accounting rules, plan sponsors can offset the impact of market fluctuations on DB plans and income statements, resulting in greater stability. This is one of the features that make DB plans so appealing during uncertain times.

OVERCOMING OBSTACLES
There are certain obstacles inherent in DB plans that may impede a revival. Organizations need to design and implement plans that overcome these barriers and deliver the pension promise that makes these plans attractive to employees. Indeed, the ability of DB plans to meet the future needs of plan sponsors will determine whether a rebirth of this retirement savings option materializes. Here are some solutions to the main barriers of DC plans.

Tax limits. If the current tax limits for DB plans are not raised significantly in the near future, employers should consider introducing a supplemental employee retirement plan (SERP)--a non-tax-sheltered plan designed to top up existing retirement arrangements. The typical SERP provides benefits under the same formula as the underlying DB plan, but with the earnings limit removed. There is one problem with SERPs, though. Plan sponsors will now have an additional plan to contend with and SERPs have a degree of risk associated with them.

Pension adjustments (PAs). PAs tend to be high with DB plans and reduce an employee's ability to contribute to a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP). Organizations can implement a flexible pension plan to address this issue. Flex plans let employees make tax-sheltered contributions to their DB plan on a voluntary basis, without affecting the room in their RRSPs. The contributions, augmented with tax-sheltered investment income, accumulate in an account until retirement. Upon termination or retirement, employees can use their flex accounts to purchase DB pension enhancements such as post-retirement indexing or bridge benefits. Some plans allow employees to transfer the flex account into their RRSP.


Inconsistent retirement income
The income replacement ratios offered through DC plans remain volatile, especially when compared to the solid promise of DB plans.
DC pension benefits as a % of final pay

Note: This chart assumes that the member participates for 25 years from ages 40 to 65 and then buys an annuity with his or her DC funds.

Termination values. DB plans do not have optimal termination values. While DC plans may have an advantage here, they also have volatile replacement ratios. Hybrid plans can offer a solution. A typical design consists of a DC plan account with a DB benefit component such as a guaranteed minimum pension. Upon termination, employees receive the funds in their larger DC accounts, but as they near retirement they get the more stable DB promise.

Hybrid plans can be difficult to communicate, expensive to administer and result in high PAs. Other options include offering a minimum termination value of twice the employee contribution as well as automatic indexing. The latter arrangement significantly increases termination values for younger employees, without increasing plan costs significantly.

The important thing to remember about termination benefits is that they are only of concern for employees who leave the plan prior to retirement. While sponsors consider the needs of younger, more mobile employees, they should not forget about older employees.

Employer risk. Sponsors should pay attention to statements of investment policy and goals/procedures and consider how asset allocation aligns with organizational goals. This is an important element of managing risk.

Funding and accounting strategies. Although actuarial reviews are only required every three years, organizations caught by the market slide and prevailing low solvency rates can benefit from more frequent reviews. In addition, as stated earlier, DB plan sponsors should take advantage of accounting rules to offset volatility and stabilize pension expenses, and use smoothing methods and the 10% corridor.

Employers can also contribute more than the minimum funding amount to shore up depressed assets and reduce pension expenses. It is helpful to ensure that the plan does not accumulate large amounts of surplus. It is also helpful to maximize plan expenses paid out of the pension trust and benchmark costs against other organizations.

Demographics. Pension plans should be aligned with an organization's human capital strategy. Early retirement windows, incentives or phased-in retirement policies need to accommodate the current and projected workforce.

Clarity. Employers may need to conduct education sessions about the company's DB plan. It is best to involve employees in the plan design stage.

Many organizations--particularly small- and medium-size employers--have moved from DB plans to DC plans over the last 10 years in response to legislative complexities that create headaches and higher costs. However, most large employers still sponsor DB plans.

With sagging profit margins and volatile fund returns, employees and employers are revisiting DB plans and recognizing the value of their security. This, combined with our aging population, indicates we may yet see a DB renaissance. BC

David Burke is the national retirement practice director and Anne Cowling is a pension consultant with Watson Wyatt Canada in Toronto. infocanada@watsonwyatt.com.
























Click here to enter:
6th Annual Communication Awards

Sponsored by:

 

 

The Group Internet Directory is now online. Click below to download the PDF.
English | French

The Romanow Commission has released its final report on the future of healthcare in Canada.

For Commissioner Romanow's recommendations, click here.

Click here for Senator Michael Kirby's report, "The Health of Canadians – The Federal Role: Recommendations for Reform."

About Us News Magazine Archives Benefits & Pensions
Links Careers Calender Contact UsHome