|
© Copyright 2002
Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the April 2002 edition of
BENEFITS CANADA magazine.
Managing DC plans in down
markets
Member reaction to underperforming markets may
be extreme. Plan sponsors must implement an effective communications program
that helps employees make informed decisions.
By Colin Ripsman
The investment climate today is characterized by great uncertainty and
caution. There were signs of a global slowdown and possibly a recession prior to
Sept. 11. The manufacturing and technology sectors had contracted in Canada and
abroad, and at home the gross domestic product declined in each of the first two
months of the third quarter of last year. By Sept. 10, 2001, returns for the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE) 300 and Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500
composite indexes as well as the Morgan Stanley Capital International EAFE index
had declined by more than 28% each since their market peaks in 2000.
One positive factor buoying the economy was a high level of consumer
confidence and spending. Unfortunately, the events of Sept. 11 and subsequent
layoffs in numerous industries eroded much of this edge. In the U.S., the
Conference Board's consumer confidence index fell from 114 in August 2001 to
97.6 in September--marking the largest drop in a single month in more than 10
years.
The onset of weaker economic markets raises new challenges for defined
contribution (DC) plan sponsors. The majority of members joined these plans
during an unprecedented period of sustained market performance in the 1990s and,
as a result, many members based their long-term expectations and asset
allocation decisions on this favourable environment. Indeed, this is the first
taste of a market downturn for many DC participants.
With this in mind, it is important to understand how investors respond to
market shocks. Research shows that many investors do not follow the basic
principles of 'buy and hold,' nor do they buy low and sell high. In fact, there
is a positive correlation between the performance of an asset class and the
level of new investment in it. The relationship is strongest with Canadian
bonds, indicating that investors react to an increase in prices by buying into
bonds and then selling them when prices fall.
The Hewitt 401(k) index in the U.S., which tracks assets flows between
equities and bonds among the DC plans that it administers, illustrates that on
nine of the 11 days between Jan. 1, 1997 and the present, when the S&P 500
experienced a significant positive or negative movement (more than 4% in one
day) trading activity was above average. In all cases, the trades were toward
the better-performing investment vehicle.
Clearly, many investors--whether they be retail investors or members of group
retirement programs--react to short-term market fluctuations. Given the
difficulty that even professional money managers have in effectively timing the
market, this type of activity is risky and unproductive.
The key feature of a DC plan from an investment perspective is the fact that
while the plan member bears the investment risk and often directs the
investments, the sponsor shoulders the legal or fiduciary risk associated with
operating the plan.
By setting up the plan and selecting the providers and investment options,
the sponsor acts in a fiduciary capacity. Its responsibilities include offering
a reasonable range of investments, selecting and monitoring these options and
educating members. Members who make sub-optimal investment decisions in times of
market turmoil may attempt to hold the sponsor responsible, claiming they were
not properly educated and could not make effective investment decisions.
The best way to reduce the fiduciary risk associated with members' investment
decisions is to develop a communication strategy that gives employees the tools
they need to make effective decisions in a turbulent market environment, and to
reinforce key messages. The communication messages should include the following
components:
1. Select an asset mix and stick to it.
Employees need to consider certain factors as they set their long-term asset
mix. They also need to understand when it is necessary to revisit asset
allocation. The key determinants in establishing an effective asset mix are
years to retirement, personal tolerance to risk and personal financial position.
Members who will not be withdrawing funds in the short term should ignore
market fluctuations and focus on the long-term accumulation of retirement
savings. They will need to build an investment portfolio that yields sufficient
long-term returns to support their desired standard of living in retirement.
The longer the holding period, the lower the variability of equity returns.
For members with a long-term horizon, stocks become less risky than bonds or
treasury bills, despite the fact that, over a short period such as one year, the
variability in stock returns is significantly higher than in bonds or treasury
bills.
Given that investment professionals who study the markets regularly have
difficulty timing asset mix movements, it is unlikely that individual investors
will be able to do better. In fact, investors can seriously hurt their long-term
investment performance by mis-timing the market. For example, by being out of
the Canadian equity market for the 10 best performance days between 1991 and
2000, an investor's annualized return over that period would have been reduced
by more than one-third. Successful investors set an asset mix based on
reasonable expectations, and stick to it, despite short-term market
fluctuations.
| Investors chase returns |
| There is a
positive correlation between significant movements in an asset class return and
retail investments in that asset class. |
| Correlation of
Canadian mutual fund movements with large market movements |
| Asset Class |
Correlation |
| Canadian equity |
0.24 |
| Canadian bond |
0.94 |
| U.S. equity |
0.05 |
| International
equity |
0.22 |
| Source: The
Investment Funds Institute of Canada |
| Note:
significant market movements in an asset class are defined as monthly movements
equal to or exceeding 400% of the average monthly movement in the asset class
between January 1998 and December 2000. |
2. Manage expectations. We have just
emerged from one of the strongest sustained periods of investment performance in
100 years in both the equity and fixed-income markets. The environment was
created largely by low inflation, declining interest rates, high real interest
rates, economic growth and strong returns in equity markets.
The outlook over the next 20 to 30 years may not be as favourable. Baby
boomers will begin to retire, causing wage pressures to escalate as a result of
labour shortages and stock markets to tumble as they draw down savings. As well,
real interest rates are likely to remain low, as government debt declines and
savings rates increase. Even if some of these forces can be tempered, it is
unlikely that we'll see the double-digit returns of the 1990s early into the
21st century.
All of this means that member expectations about future returns must change
to reflect reasonable long-term market expectations. Again, expectations for
future returns should be in line with historic return levels. This means a
long-term balanced fund should expect to earn a real annualized return of
approximately 5% a year.
3. This time is not different. Investors
tend to get in trouble when they believe that a temporary change in market
circumstances represents a permanent shift in market fundamentals. This type of
thinking created the unrealistic price escalation that marked the technology
bubble of the late 1990s. We see similar sentiments among individual investors
who believe that periods of strong or weak market performance will continue
indefinitely.
The message to members is that things are never as rosy as they seem in good
times and never as bleak as they seem in bad times. In the current weak equity
markets, where many DC members will have lost money in equity funds, it is
important for investors to remember that markets move in cycles, and that they
will recover over time.
The average bear market, defined as a decline of 15% or more in the TSE 300,
has lasted about eight months, and it has taken approximately 17 months from the
onset to fully recover market losses. It is important to teach members that if
they remain invested in the market, they will participate in its eventual
recovery.
4. Rebalancing is important. Asset
allocation can drift significantly in volatile markets. Members should be aware
of the need to periodically review their asset mix and rebalance it to their
long-term targets. Portfolio rebalancing will also help investors trim
top-performing asset classes and buy into weaker-performing classes.
While it is important that these messages are repeated, sponsors should avoid
advising individual members directly. These messages should be reinforced at the
plan level, as part of the basic investor education skill program.
A critical component of managing sponsor risk in volatile markets is a
regular assessment of the need for education. This can be done by monitoring
plan investment and transaction trends, as well as noting unusual call centre
and interactive voice response activity along with sharp increases in
transactions during times of market turbulence. Understanding the nature of
member inquiries can help sponsors determine which issues are of the most
concern to members, and enable them to tailor their messages accordingly.
Similarly, pronounced changes in plan investment trends, such as a sharp
shift in the asset mix for the plan overall or the asset mix for a particular
demographic group, can signal the need to reinforce key messages.
Prolonged bear markets and extreme market volatility create discomfort and
anxiety for institutional investors and pension committees. For individual DC
investors, who often have little experience with investment markets, they can
cause panic or extreme reactions. Sponsors can help to mitigate their fiduciary
risk and increase member satisfaction by ensuring the right messages are
repeated and that member reactions are monitored. BC
Colin Ripsman is
a senior investment consultant and the leader of William M. Mercer Ltd.'s
Defined Contribution Consulting Group in Toronto. colin.ripsman@ca.wmmercer.com.
|