|
© Copyright 2002
Rogers Media. The following article first appeared in the April 2002 edition of
BENEFITS CANADA magazine.
Insights
Contrarian views, news and international
intrigue
By Deanna Rosolen
>
Insights:
Lamoureux's governance lessons
>E-Poll: What
rate of investment return do you expect your pension fund portfolio to earn in
2002?
Lamoureux's governance
lessons
Good governance pays off. This is
the message that Claude Lamoureux, president and chief executive officer of the
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, wants to drive home to corporate Canada
and institutional investors. Well-governed, and by extension well-managed,
companies are among the best investments, he says. The problem is, there are too
many examples to the contrary.
In an effort to remedy the situation, Canada's most
renowned shareholder activist has come out with a list of 11 proposals on what
institutional investors, companies and governments can do to improve governance.
Lamoureux says Teachers' is developing a governance scorecard and contacting all
companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange to encourage them to follow the
principles outlined below. The pension giant also wants other pension funds and
money managers to join the campaign.
Here are Lamoureux's 11 principles of good governance:
1. All fiduciaries
should vote the shares they hold--and report on how they voted to those for whom
they invest.
2. Corporations should
be required to report the results of each shareholder vote within one day of the
annual general meeting, if not the same day.
3. Governance
committees should seek the active involvement of their institutional investors
in recruiting independent directors.
4. All directors should
invest their own money in the shares of companies they govern. Nothing aligns
director and shareholder interests quite like having real money on the line.
5. The board should
have regular sessions without management present.
6. Canadian regulators
should work with the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants to promote the
best accounting standards. Regulators should find independent individuals who
are more than securities or financial specialists to oversee compliance. It is
heartening to see an Ontario Securities Commission panel reject a penalty for
insider trading negotiated by staff. We need more commonsense outrage and less
clubby negotiation behind closed doors.
7. All press releases
should be based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings or
at least reconciled to GAAP earnings. The releases should also be approved by
the auditor and audit committee.
8. Annual reports,
quarterly reports and proxy circulars should be written in language that makes
sense to ordinary investors. Claims of sophistication and complexity are not an
acceptable defence for obfuscation.
9. Auditors should not
be allowed to earn other fees of any kind from the companies they audit.
10. Laws should be
changed to make share ownership and options tax-neutral.
11. The cost of options
should be clearly charged on the profit and loss statements disclosed in the
financial statements and should be deducted from income.
Volatility
 Illustration by
David Brown
E-POLL
What rate of investment return do you expect your
pension fund portfolio to earn in 2002?
Positive
expectations
Sixty-two per cent of
respondents expect a rate of return of between 5.1% and 10% in 2002. Only 2%
expect a negative return on their fund's investments.

Reports say the economy is slowly turning around. The Bank of Canada's Web
site, for instance, says that Governor David Dodge told an audience in France
recently that "the worst of the downturn is over. A recovery is under way." U.S.
Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan informed the Senate Banking Committee that
the American economy is also recovering from last year's recession--albeit
slowly.
Another sign is the number of Canadian pension plan sponsors (62%) in this
month's E-poll that say they expect their pension fund portfolio to earn a rate
of return between 5.1% and 10% in 2002. Up to 11% expect a rate of return of
over 10%; 25% expect a rate of return between 0% and 5%, and only 2% expect a
negative rate of return.
Al Dyck is a benefits adviser and independent broker in Cranbrook, B.C. He
works with several defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors and says, on average,
plan members could see a rate of return of between 4% and 5%. In 2001 returns
were about -4%.
Dyck says in one case he met with an employer and its pension committee and
reworked the plan's portfolio. It came down to "redefining what we were trying
to accomplish," he says.
One employer in Ontario who wished to remain anonymous says her pension plan
expects a rate of return of between 5.1% and 10%, but adds that this may not be
realistic. The plan's actuarial valuation for 2002, she says, is 6.5%.
Theron Sawaski says equities are the major class bringing returns down in his
pension fund. Sawaski is manager of human resources at ATCO Structures in
Calgary and adds that they're expecting a rate of return of between 5.1% and
10%.
ATCO doesn't plan to rework its portfolio, says Sawaski. Instead it will
"stay the course. We weren't as highly involved in technology stocks as some
other plans, so we probably fared a little bit better. It's long-term for us,
it's not running with recent high returns."
Another employer who wished to remain anonymous says her plan members'
investments in "dot-coms [and] Nortel Networks, didn't do well and brought
returns down." She adds the company's investment manager is reworking the
portfolio to decrease investments in those types of stocks.
The company has a DC plan, a group registered retirement savings plan and a
non-registered savings plan. The employer says members haven't expressed too
much concern. "Our education is that these are long-term investments. And yes,
in the short term the funds haven't done that well, but we do a comparison for
three, five and 10 years. We try to get [members] to look at a wider horizon."
|