It’s shaping up to be one of the biggest deals in Canadian history,
as the country’s biggest pension funds vie for ownership of Bell
Canada Enterprises Inc.(BCE). The largest player currently getting ready
to bid on BCE is the $110 billion Canada Pension Plan Investment Board,
which is leading a consortium that includes the $143.5 billion Caisse
de depot et placement du Quebec and New York-based private equity firm,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Private equity fund Cerberus Capital
Management, following on its successful bid to take over Chrysler, has
tossed its proverbial hat into the BCE ring. Most recently, the Ontario
Teachers’ Pension Plan, with assets under management of $106 billion,
has teamed up with Providence Equity Partners and entered into privitization
talks with the telecom firm.
With
all this pension-driven activity heating up around the blue-chip phone
company, it’s raising some questions about the growing gap between
cash-rich public pension funds and the smaller private sector pension
funds under which many other Canadians are covered. With only the biggest
funds able to throw their hats in the ring for BCE(a deal said to be
in the range of $32 billion), where will that leave smaller funds and
investors also struggling to meet their own liabilities? And it begs
the question down the road, if more large publicly traded Canadian companies
are taken private for the benefit of a few public sector funds and their
members, where will that leave the rest of the pension funds? Clearly,
a major debate is in the works.
Malcolm
Hamilton, worldwide partner with Mercer Human Resource Consulting in
Toronto, is one of the pension industry experts voicing some concern
over the potential ability of large public pension funds to buy big
Canadian companies and take them private. He thinks any decision on
the part of the government to allow such a takeover would be bad tax
policy, because it would allow public sector pension
plans to do things that other tax sheltered investors can’t. The
crux of the argument lies in the federal government’s decision
a few months back to put the kibosh on income trusts. As a result, Hamilton
says, many pension funds are looking for another way to avoid the double
taxation of corporate profits inherent in public equity investing. “This
is something the Feds didn’t bargain on,” he explains. “There
are a number of public sector pension plans in Canada that are large
enough, working alone or in conjunction with others, to buy large corporations
and change their capital structures. By buying a company, taking it
private, levering the capital structure by taking on debt and reducing
equity, a pension plan can eliminate much of the corporate income tax,”
explains Hamilton. “The objective is to distribute corporate earnings
as interest, which is taxed once, rather than as dividends, which are
taxed twice. By taking BCE private and reorganizing it, pension plans
can eliminate much of the tax that BCE would otherwise have paid going
forward—which would be fine if other tax sheltered investors were
given the same opportunity.” So, are big private equity deals
the next big tax break for pension funds after income trusts? Possibly—but
you have to be really big to do it.
| “Preventing
private sector employees from avoiding the double taxation of
corporate profits by killing income trusts, while allowing public
sector employees to do essentially the same thing by using their
pension funds to buy and restructure corporations, is poor public
policy.” - Malcolm Hamilton |
Tax tricks
Hamilton
says that, while such a policy benefits the members of public sector
plans with the resources to buy large companies such as BCE, it doesn’t
create a very level playing field for the members of smaller, private
sector pension funds—or for Canadians who rely on RRSPs. As Hamilton
puts it, if the Feds allow a public pension fund such as the CPP Investment
Board and its consortium of public sector funds to take over a company
like BCE, they are essentially blessing “a tax-preferred alternative
available exclusively to public sector plans.” And that doesn’t
make for a level playing field. “Preventing private sector employees
from avoiding the double taxation of corporate profits by killing income
trusts, while allowing public sector employees to do essentially the
same thing by using their pension funds to buy and restructure corporations,
is poor public policy,” he says.
(...continued
on next page)
1
| 2 | 3
|