Most Popular Stories

In the Spotlight

Quick Start Menu
Awards Programs
Careers
Directories
Industry Events Calendar
Industry Events Photos
Magazine Extras
Online Expert Panel
Online Reports
People Watch
Rogers Conferences

A WEB-EXCLUSIVE FEATURE

The Battle for BCE

Public sector pension funds are vying for BCE but is it good public policy? That’s debatable...

By Caroline Cakebread


It’s shaping up to be one of the biggest deals in Canadian history, as the country’s biggest pension funds vie for ownership of Bell Canada Enterprises Inc.(BCE). The largest player currently getting ready to bid on BCE is the $110 billion Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, which is leading a consortium that includes the $143.5 billion Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec and New York-based private equity firm, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Private equity fund Cerberus Capital Management, following on its successful bid to take over Chrysler, has tossed its proverbial hat into the BCE ring. Most recently, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, with assets under management of $106 billion, has teamed up with Providence Equity Partners and entered into privitization talks with the telecom firm.

Advertisement

With all this pension-driven activity heating up around the blue-chip phone company, it’s raising some questions about the growing gap between cash-rich public pension funds and the smaller private sector pension funds under which many other Canadians are covered. With only the biggest funds able to throw their hats in the ring for BCE(a deal said to be in the range of $32 billion), where will that leave smaller funds and investors also struggling to meet their own liabilities? And it begs the question down the road, if more large publicly traded Canadian companies are taken private for the benefit of a few public sector funds and their members, where will that leave the rest of the pension funds? Clearly, a major debate is in the works.

Malcolm Hamilton, worldwide partner with Mercer Human Resource Consulting in Toronto, is one of the pension industry experts voicing some concern over the potential ability of large public pension funds to buy big Canadian companies and take them private. He thinks any decision on the part of the government to allow such a takeover would be bad tax policy, because it would allow public sector pension plans to do things that other tax sheltered investors can’t. The crux of the argument lies in the federal government’s decision a few months back to put the kibosh on income trusts. As a result, Hamilton says, many pension funds are looking for another way to avoid the double taxation of corporate profits inherent in public equity investing. “This is something the Feds didn’t bargain on,” he explains. “There are a number of public sector pension plans in Canada that are large enough, working alone or in conjunction with others, to buy large corporations and change their capital structures. By buying a company, taking it private, levering the capital structure by taking on debt and reducing equity, a pension plan can eliminate much of the corporate income tax,” explains Hamilton. “The objective is to distribute corporate earnings as interest, which is taxed once, rather than as dividends, which are taxed twice. By taking BCE private and reorganizing it, pension plans can eliminate much of the tax that BCE would otherwise have paid going forward—which would be fine if other tax sheltered investors were given the same opportunity.” So, are big private equity deals the next big tax break for pension funds after income trusts? Possibly—but you have to be really big to do it.

“Preventing private sector employees from avoiding the double taxation of corporate profits by killing income trusts, while allowing public sector employees to do essentially the same thing by using their pension funds to buy and restructure corporations, is poor public policy.” - Malcolm Hamilton


Tax tricks

Hamilton says that, while such a policy benefits the members of public sector plans with the resources to buy large companies such as BCE, it doesn’t create a very level playing field for the members of smaller, private sector pension funds—or for Canadians who rely on RRSPs. As Hamilton puts it, if the Feds allow a public pension fund such as the CPP Investment Board and its consortium of public sector funds to take over a company like BCE, they are essentially blessing “a tax-preferred alternative available exclusively to public sector plans.” And that doesn’t make for a level playing field. “Preventing private sector employees from avoiding the double taxation of corporate profits by killing income trusts, while allowing public sector employees to do essentially the same thing by using their pension funds to buy and restructure corporations, is poor public policy,” he says.

(...continued on next page)

1 | 2 | 3

Sponsor Microsites
Conferences

Career Search

 

eSupplements & Reports

 

   

ROGERS and Mobius Design are trade-marks of Rogers Communications Inc. and
are used under license by Rogers Media Inc. and Rogers Publishing Ltd.
LEGAL NOTICE

Kenneth Lee