A number of states are moving forward with new initiatives to help workers save for retirement, even as the Republican-led Congress tries to block rules making it easier for them to do so.

Studies show a sharp divide in retirement savings between those who have employer-sponsored plans and those who do not. The state programs are designed to fill in the gap.

Dozens of small business owners recently gathered in Schaumburg, Illinois, to learn about the new state-sponsored retirement savings initiative, “Secure Choice IRA.” Officials said it could help about 1.2 million workers who don’t have access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan.

“It’s clear there’s a retirement crisis,” Illinois Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs told the small business owners. “This is a problem not only for the families but for all of us.”

Read: Is Illinois’ auto-enrolment savings program better than the ORPP?

Seven states — California, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Oregon and Washington, in addition to Illinois — are in various stages of implementing state-sponsored retirement savings plans.

California’s plan will automatically enrol about 6.8 million employees. Employees can opt out of the plan and employers are not required to match contributions. Payroll deductions are expected to start in 2018.

The plans with automatic payroll deduction are IRAs and are tax-deductible, which means employees get a tax intensive because they don’t pay federal taxes on the money saved for retirement until they’re withdrawn.

The states programs were helped along by Labor Department rules governing automatic enrolment and payroll deductions.

But Congress is moving to block those rules. A House vote is scheduled Wednesday.

Read: Employers, employees differ on automatic enrolment features: CAP Member Survey

“Our nation faces difficult retirement challenges, but more government isn’t the solution,” Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., the chairman of the House subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pension, said in a statement. “A better way is to reduce costly red tape and make it easier for small businesses to band together to offer retirement plans for their employees.”

Walberg said there were concerns that these new retirement plans discouraged small businesses from offering private-sector plans and had inadequate safeguards.

A spokesman for Labor Secretary-nominee Andrew Puzder said it would be “premature” for the fast-food executive to comment on this issue before being confirmed.

At least 30 states have considered proposals to study or establish state-sponsored retirement savings plans over the past five years, according to the Center for Retirement Initiatives at Georgetown University.

The Labor Department estimates that as many as 70 million workers could benefit.

Read: Just 49% of Americans participate in a workplace retirement plan: survey

Americans without work-sponsored savings plans are less likely to save for retirement. Research from the nonpartisan research organization Employee Benefit Research Institute shows that 62 per cent of employees with an employer-sponsored savings plan had more than $25,000 in savings and 22 per cent of those workers saved $100,000. By contrast, about 94 per cent of workers without access to those plans had less than $25,000, according to the 2014 study.

Those at the lower end of the income distribution are hit particularly hard, with many relying solely on social security when they retire, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

“States win when more people are prepared for retirement and financially ready to be self-sufficient, which reduces the need for state spending on elder-support programs,” said Gerri Madrid-Davis, AARP’s director of state advocacy and strategies.

Read: U.S. men save more for retirement than women: study

Democratic state Sen. Daniel Biss, who introduced Illinois’ program, has called it the “most efficient and least intrusive way” to help people save for retirement while putting little burden on the state’s employers. But Mark Grant, Illinois director of the National Federation of Independent Business, says it adds to a long list of mandates small businesses have to fulfil.

“If a business can afford to do this kind of thing, they would do it for their employees,” Grant said.

The plan, passed in 2015, limits participation to small businesses that have been open for more than two years and have at least 25 employees. The state hopes to fully implement it by 2018.

Jennifer Piacenza, operations manager for Palatine Welding Company, said she’s excited about Secure Choice but worries that the 35 employees at her family business won’t take advantage of it. “We offered a retirement program to our employees and people didn’t participate,” Piacenza said. “We couldn’t maintain it.”

Read: Canada ranks higher in retirement security

Copyright © 2017 Transcontinental Media G.P. Originally published on benefitscanada.com

Register today

For the latest industry news and opinion sign up for our daily e-newsletter.

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Benefits Canada admins. Thanks!

* These fields are required.
Field required
Field required
Field required