The Ontario Court of Appeal has reduced the punitive damages awarded against a former Wal-Mart employee.

In 2012, a jury trial awarded nearly $1.5 million in compensatory, mental suffering, aggravated and punitive damages to Meredith Boucher for her claim that she was constructively dismissed as a result of the bullying and abusive conduct of her store manager.

The damages comprised $1,000,000 in punitive damages against Wal-Mart; $150,000 in punitive damages against the store manager, for which Wal-Mart was vicariously liable; $200,000 in aggravated damages against Wal-Mart for the manner in which she was dismissed; $100,000 for intentional infliction of mental suffering against the store manager, for which Wal-Mart was vicariously liable; and 20 weeks’ salary.

According to Hicks Morley’s FTR Now update, damages awarded against Wal-Mart were reduced to $100,000 from $1,000,000 and against the store manager to $10,000 from $150,000. The rest of the appeal was dismissed.

“The court’s decision to reduce the punitive damages award against Wal-Mart has restored balance to the quantum of punitive damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action,” says the update.

The punitive damages awarded by the jury were almost twice as large as the next largest award in a reported employment law case. Punitive damages in the employment law context have rarely exceeded $100,000 and then only in egregious cases involving more serious and longer-term misconduct than that attributed to Wal-Mart.

“By reducing the punitive damages award so significantly in this case, the Court of Appeal has reaffirmed the principles of rationality and proportionality that must underlie a punitive damages award,” according to the update.

“The decision is also notable because it affirms an award for punitive damages against an employer cannot be based solely on an employee’s wrongdoing. The employer itself must have engaged in conduct that is harsh, offensive, high-handed or otherwise warranting punitive damages. Mere negligence by the employer is not sufficient. However, an employer may still be vicariously liable for an award of punitive damages against an employee made based on the employee’s misconduct.”

Related articles:

Copyright © 2019 Transcontinental Media G.P. Originally published on

Join us on Twitter

See all comments Recent Comments

Robert in Vancouver:

Hopefully Wal-Mart will sue the bully to get their money back, plus all their legal and other costs.

It’s not right that the company gets stuck with all of the fines and the bully gets no punishment.

If the court fined bullies like they fine companies, there would be much less bullying.

Monday, May 26 at 6:49 pm | Reply

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Benefits Canada admins. Thanks!

* These fields are required.
Field required
Field required
Field required