Many Canadians (48%) retired earlier than expected due at least partly to circumstances outside of their control, an Angus Reid poll finds.

Just 46% of retirees controlled the circumstances surrounding their retirement while the remaining 6% retired later than planned.

Read: Retirees have nearly $29,000 in annual expenses

Overall, 36% retired at age 55 or younger; 28% retired in their late 50s (between 56 and 60) and 36% retired at 61 or older.

Nearly half (48%) of the retirees agree with the statement: “I’m worried about my money lasting my lifetime”; 19% strongly agree. This anxiety is shared by substantial numbers of retired Canadians from all walks of life, including 54% of retired women and retirees with less formal education (52%).

Another survey item asked respondents to broadly describe how they are faring financially in retirement:

  • 38% say they “have enough money to do everything I want”;
  • 44% say they “live comfortably but don’t have money for extras”; and
  • 18% say “making ends meet is a struggle”.

Read: Highlights of Benefits Canada’s retiree/pre-retiree research

Financing retirement

The Canadian retirees surveyed highlighted the following primary means of financing their retirement:

  • government pension – selected by 57% as one of their three main sources of retirement income;
  • a work pension – 53%;
  • retirement savings (i.e., RRSPs) – 30%;
  • investments – 13%;
  • downsizing/selling assets – 6%; and
  • other sources (inheritance, support from children, etc.) – cited by a total of 11%.

Read: Retirees may be reluctant to sell homes

How one’s retirement is funded is strongly correlated with financial security.

A government pension is a primary source of retirement income for 67% of those struggling to make ends meet versus 43% of those who describe themselves as well-off. Twenty-eight percent of those struggling are able to rely on a work pension—whereas 61% of the best-off group point to a work pension as a primary means of support.

This affluent retired group is also considerably more likely to rely on retirement savings (40% do so) or investment income (25%). These two vehicles were cited much less often by the struggling group, who were more likely to say they have downsized (13% had done so) or used other means (such as support from children) to support themselves in retirement.

Read: Canadians feel better prepared for retirement

Public/private sector divide

Running through all these results is a rather sharp divide between public sector and private sector retirees and, relatedly, between those who had been union members and those who had not. The marked difference in perspective lends considerable credence to arguments about a growing inequity between Canada’s public and private sector workers.

Private sector retirees are considerably more likely to report leaving the workforce early due at least partly to circumstances outside their control (53% versus 41%). They are almost twice as likely to report that making ends meet is a struggle (22% versus 12%). Private sector retirees are also more likely to worry about outliving their money (53% versus 41%).

Public sector retirees are much more likely to be relying on a work pension as a primary support in their retirement (75% versus 39%) whereas their private sector counterparts are more likely to be relying on other savings and supports. (Both groups, significantly, cite Canadian government pensions as a main source of retirement support: 57% each.)

Copyright © 2019 Transcontinental Media G.P. Originally published on benefitscanada.com

Join us on Twitter

See all comments Recent Comments

JayC:

For those of you who contemplate earlier retirement options let me explain how your industry meant our life is hell. In the mid to late 1990s DC pension plan statements by at least one of the three major carriers were projected on assumptions of 10% + . Pension income estimates were absurd and some of us returned them as idiocy. Unfortunately many more were mailed direct to clients and employees. These are the group of retirees who are struggling today because they were advised that with as little as $100,000, a $1000 a month pension could be provided. The DC industry was full of itself.
Fortunately for some?, they believed one other piece of advice propogated by the agents and investment advisors. OAS and CPP will go broke. As you know this is neither true nor is it even close to the truth. However, by postponing retirement by a couple of years the Government can create an environment which saves face for these agents of misplaced doom but apparently aptly placed political allegiance. Not only that but the industry can hold on to the money for two more years.
The other piece of industry supplied DC misinformation was the crap about annuities resulting in lower payouts over time because of the so called timing and expense issues. Now your DB plans are using them after lobbying to change legislation allowing it.
Let’s hope this industry can do a lot better job than their predecessors did, or you also can enjoy a retirement on 15% of your preretirement income with 1M* of retirement capital.

Friday, July 03 at 1:33 pm | Reply

Jacki:

My Mother was advised to retire in her late 50’s and has been receiving minimal payments. She is now 80 and it is so hard for her to survive. She is near poverty level.
Is there a way to apply to get her more? I am helping but it is putting a huge financial strain on my minimal income.
Any advice would be helpful.

Saturday, February 18 at 10:07 am | Reply

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Benefits Canada admins. Thanks!

* These fields are required.
Field required
Field required
Field required