Back to Article:

Sounding Board: Dental networks not the answer to reducing dental fees

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Benefits Canada admins. Thanks!

* These fields are required.
Field required
Field required
Field required
Comments

Chris Pryce, CEBS:

This is some great insight. There is reference to staff requiring fair compensation for their work. Its been about 25 years and I don’r recall any firm I have worked for, or any that I have owned, ever giving a benefits quote to a dental office, or having a dental office as a group client (Yes, I understand offices employ professional courtesy for dental among staff) but health and disability would be pretty important coverages for a female dominated industry I suspect.

If the ODA or CDA has an association plan, I would be curious to see the take-up or penetration rates to see what percentage of workers (not dentists) are indeed covered.

Mr. Taillon also assumes that we don’t realize that there is a lower procedure cost for cash paying versus consumers who have private insurance. It would be bold to suggest that private payers subsidize the cash payers under that model, but that would be pure speculation.

Tuesday, November 13 at 1:53 pm | Reply

Bill Zolis:

I agree with some of the comments from Mr. Taillon, however we also know dentistry is a very profitable business or else we would not see new practices opening up consistently. Fee guides are only guides. Most patients do not ask what the dental codes mean when paying their portion of the bill, they are afraid to. Most patients do not calculate how many units of scaling should be charged for their appointment because they do not know and are afraid to ask.

Wednesday, November 14 at 11:33 am | Reply

Joe Nunes:

“To protect the public, Canadians need to maintain their right to choose and access treatment from their own preferred dentists and specialists. The savings from networks are driven by limiting the choice of providers (including specialists) and of treatment services offered to the patient.”

I have to take my car to a registered dealer for warranty work – hardly a significant infringement on my freedom and part of the contract when I bought the car. If an employer wants to limit choice of dentists (presumably to get a volume discount), they can say so in the employment contract and employees have the ‘freedom’ to work elsewhere if they are dissatisfied with the offer.

The fee guide is a dream come true for dentists because if they get a large percentage of patients agreeing to pay those amounts they do quite well in Ontario and I assume across Canada.

The CDA should be careful in ‘poking the bear’ because the next stop is for employers to tell employees they have to choose between drug coverage and dental coverage, and no matter how the decision splits there will be lost revenue for dentists. Dentists – like lawyers, accountants, and even actuaries already have – must come to accept that global economics and stagnating wage increases means the average patient has fewer dollars for dental care – not more.

Thursday, November 15 at 12:52 pm | Reply

Join us on Twitter