Evaluating LDI
August 01, 2008 | Stephen Goldman and Scott McDermott

Ten important questions that plan sponsors should ask when considering liability driven investing.

Falling interest rates, lagging equity markets and greater volatility in pension plan solvency ratios have created renewed awareness of the risks of pension plan assets and obligations, and the need to keep pension plans focused on providing for their beneficiaries. This has led to a more active debate in today’s investment community over how a pension plan can best manage its assets and its solvency ratio.

Liability driven investing (LDI) is not a specific investment product. Rather, it is a way of approaching pension plan management by combining the best elements of both growth-driven and immunization investment strategies. In addition to considering asset diversification, each of a pension plan’s investments is evaluated according to its potential for appreciation and its potential as a liability hedge, with the portfolio allocated to strike an appropriate balance between these two seemingly contradictory goals.

Due to differences in plan liability profiles, solvencies and fiduciary risk appetite, there is no one-size-fits-all LDI solution. Each pension plan must tailor its own solution to its particular circumstances. When evaluating LDI solutions, here are some key considerations for plan sponsors.

1 Surplus risk – How big should the hedge be and how much interest rate mismatch is appropriate?

There are four key drivers of surplus risk. One, the investment policy (the degree to which the plan takes asset allocation or beta risk with the expectation of growing plan assets in excess of liabilities). Two, the overall liability duration (the sensitivity of plan liabilities to changes in interest rates). Three, unhedgeable liability risks (including mortality, employee turnover, projected future wage inflation and other actuarial assumptions). And four, current funded status.

Figure 1 (see below) demonstrates that hedging greater percentages of the interest rate risk of liabilities leads to a reduction in surplus risk. However, the marginal surplus risk reduction beyond a 70% to 80% hedge is minimal for plans that are simultaneously investing in equities and other risky growth-oriented investments. Trustee risk tolerance and asset allocation conviction should drive the decision of how much mismatch should be retained.

2 Benchmark selection – What is the right benchmark?

An actuary’s liability cash flow projections are usually not investable and are typically only recalculated once per year. Therefore, they do not serve as a useful benchmark. In general, pension plan fiduciaries will want to adopt a benchmark that can be customized to the plan’s specific circumstances and that mimics, to the extent practicable, the interest rate risk of the plan’s liability cash flows. While there are a wide variety of benchmarks available, critical issues to consider include measurability, liquidity, transparency and investability.

Related Link

The answer need not necessarily be a customized benchmark. Proxy benchmarks such as the DEX Long Universe, which approximate a plan’s duration risk, are most useful when the intent is to hedge only a fraction of the liability exposure. These types of benchmarks may also be appropriate for plans with a shorter duration and/or greater uncertainty in the projected benefit stream. Proxy benchmarks have the advantages of being simple, publicly recognized, quoted daily and easy to explain. They have the disadvantages of embodying some duration, convexity and/or yield curve sensitivity mismatches to liabilities, which may not be present in a customized benchmark.

Customized benchmarks, such as a blend of government bond or interest rate swaps, improve on a proxy benchmark by attempting to more closely match the plan’s liability duration, convexity and yield curve exposures. Customized benchmarks may be appropriate when the objective is to hedge a larger fraction of liabilities and may be particularly suitable for a frozen or closed plan, as there is greater confidence in the projected liability stream. Possible disadvantages to a customized benchmark include complexity and the need to build and maintain such indexes.

Latest news

CAAT pension plan board chair removed amid ongoing governance emergency

Don Smith, the recently suspended chair of the Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology pension plan’s board of trustees, has been removed from his position...

UPP pursuing industrial European real estate through joint venture, Caisse selling 11% in Quebec telecommunications operator shares

The University Pension Plan Ontario is creating a joint venture with Schroders Capital to invest in high-quality logistics and industrial real estate across northwestern Europe....

  • By: Staff
  • February 6, 2026 February 6, 2026
  • 15:00

Bank of Canada to stay course on policy in 2026, unless trade shock risk increases: expert

The Bank of Canada is facing an increasingly uncertain 2026 despite experts agreeing on its current policy path. Etienne Bordeleau-Labrecque, vice-president and portfolio manager at...

Coverage of the 2025 Face to Face Drug Plan Management Forum

Running for 20 years, Benefits Canada’s 2025 Face to Face Drug Plan Management Forum is the industry’s most popular drug benefits conference. This year, attendees...

Today's top stories

Federal government expanding RTO mandate for public employees

The federal government is expanding its return-to-office mandate for public employees. As of May 4, executives in the federal public service will be required to...

  • By: Staff
  • February 6, 2026 February 6, 2026
  • 15:00

Expert panel: Updated CAPSA guideline, AI tools among key topics for CAP sponsors in 2026

With the new year may come new resolutions — or at least topics to keep in mind — for capital accumulation plan sponsors. Ongoing compliance...

More than half of Canadian employees lack an employer-sponsored pension plan: survey

Just 48 per cent of working Canadians say they have an employer-sponsored pension plan, according to a new survey by IG Wealth Management. The survey,...

  • By: Staff
  • February 6, 2026 February 4, 2026
  • 09:00

Survey finds Canadian CEOs’ confidence in economy declining

While 61 per cent of global chief executive officers expect global economic growth to improve, only 47 per cent of Canadian CEOs agree, and confidence...

  • By: Staff
  • February 3, 2026 February 3, 2026
  • 15:00